Skip to content

了解更多有關新高鐵「貫通南北方案」

十月 12, 2009

你可按本網站右上角的連結 下載或瀏覽 新高鐵專家組 新高鐵「貫通南北方案」的簡報和方案全文

廣告
3 則迴響 leave one →
  1. Ho Lok Sang permalink
    十月 16, 2009 1:42 下午

    I find the ProCommons’ proposal very sensible.

    We need to consider alternative proposals and seek out the one that provides the community with the biggest net benefits.

    The government proposal is too costly. Any accessibility gains achieved over the ProCommons’ scheme appear overwhelmed by the much higher cost. And even those accessibility gains have yet to be demonstrated.

    I agree that a terminus in the downtown area is not necessarily more accessible. Much depends on the access links.

    A terminus in Kam Sheung Road has the added advantage that it may well enhance the utilization rates of some of the other existing railway links and improve land use.

  2. jimmy permalink
    十月 20, 2009 7:35 上午

    It is better NOT to build the 新高鐵 (high speed-railway) terminus at the CBD.

    My reasons :

    1. It is much costly for the construction and on-going operation.

    2. 新高鐵 (high speed-railway) is an inter-city system, should not be situated in the CBD, much safer to be situated outside the city-centre.

    3. An exchange (terminals of the high speed-railway and in-town transports) at the city boundary may develop another sub-CBD at the out-skirt of the city ( or CBD). 

    Besides these, I very much wish the government to disclose more about their plan and proposal of locating the proposed terminus at western kowloon and the proposed railway route.

    The high speed trains are almost like regular flights of flying objects. I think that will be very dangerous to let the high-speed long trains to be running in the city!!!

  3. Marcus Lam permalink
    十月 21, 2009 5:20 上午

    I support the new proposal. I think our Government should build the high speed-railway in a sensible way. The high speed-railway should be convenient to most of the users. And now, the high speed-railway consultant group has found a better route and less costly way to build this high speed-railway. Our Government should listen and reconsider their proposal.

發表迴響

在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入:

WordPress.com Logo

您的留言將使用 WordPress.com 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Twitter picture

您的留言將使用 Twitter 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Facebook照片

您的留言將使用 Facebook 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Google+ photo

您的留言將使用 Google+ 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

連結到 %s

%d 位部落客按了讚: