Skip to content

向政府、立法會議員表達支持新高鐵方案

六百億,點解倒落西九黑洞?

起高鐵,必須做到全民受惠!

政府一意孤行要用650億元,興建全世界最昂貴的高速鐵路,但其實「新高鐵專家組」已經設計出一個更平、更快、更好的「貫通南北方案」,造價只須一半。

慳番三百億元,可以做晒呢啲野:

用100億元恢復興建居屋,為八萬個夾心階層家庭提供希望。

用60億元更換二千部天天大噴廢氣的舊巴士,改善空氣汚染及降低巴士車費。

用9億元馬上在中學分階段實施小班教學。

用4億元幫助副學士學生,將大學入學率從18%提升至20%。

用24億元做晒社聯建議的十項減貧措施,幫助老人家、殘疾人士、貧窮兒童、創造一萬個職位,17,000個培訓額,並使12萬家庭受恵。

重剩100億元,你想點駛?

教育、醫療、交通、環保、全民退休保障,都可以惗!

興建高鐵必須考慮成本效益,讓全民受惠,不能洗脚唔抹脚!

停止政府撥款興建天價高鐵

要求立法會獨立評估專家方案

去信你的立法會議員和運輸及房屋局 停止政府撥款興建天價高鐵 要求立法會獨立評估專家方案

廣告
9 則迴響 leave one →
  1. 十月 19, 2009 4:27 上午

    支持設站於錦上路站

    • kts_hk permalink
      十一月 5, 2009 7:44 上午

      Project 細左. cap 水自然小.

      應該將總站建於南呀島. 造價2000億. 利益輸送就更容易,.

  2. Chan Kwong Fat permalink
    十月 20, 2009 2:41 上午

    Concerning conflict between government and the Choi Yuen villagers and the extremely high construction cost, I urge our government to consider alternative plans, and the proposition raised here is one of the good examples.

  3. Tsim Siu San permalink
    十月 20, 2009 4:32 上午

    I strongly oppose our government’s original proposal to build the termination station of the new high speed cross border rail in West Kowloon and that I support the proposition to build it in Kam Tin, to save cost as well as to bring about more convenience to most people other than those who live in or close to west Kowloon.

    No doubt the government funding comes from the people in Hong Kong, not the Chief Excutive Officer nor various government oficials. I urge them to take good care of our views and to make a good decision in spending our money, i.e. make a good choice to save cost and benefit to more citizens, relatively!

  4. Wilson permalink
    十月 20, 2009 1:42 下午

    Support your new terminal solution,west Kowloon is too crowded.

  5. Chung permalink
    十月 22, 2009 7:02 上午

    I support the revised proposal. Hope the govt. will give adequate time for public discussion.

  6. David LEUNG permalink
    十月 31, 2009 8:43 上午

    I am in support of constructing the Express Rail Link (ERL) but the Government Option is certainly NOT the best option for the continued development of Hong Kong as a whole. The Government should examine the mertis of Alternative Intergrated Option by ending the ERL ending at Kam Tin.

  7. kts_hk permalink
    十一月 5, 2009 7:39 上午

    I know why government perfer higher cost on the new railway project. It is because the bigger of the project could let the government transfer more of the benefit to the noble.

    HK Government good job!!! Please ask the taxpayer pay more for establish the superior relationship between you and big corp.

  8. Eric Yuen permalink
    十一月 28, 2009 2:58 上午

    This proposal seems more fair and cost-effective as
    1. Better utilize the “Under-Used” airport railway
    2. Enable more resident, especially new territory to take a ride on it.
    3. With a quick lane (Airport Railway) from existing Kowloon Station and Hong Kong Station, the people live there actually won’t spend more time for this new proposal.
    4. Less under-ground construction work that may affects people, less money waste
    5. More direct connection from Airport and the Express Railway station in Kam Tin
    6. Can enable more development chance for area near Kam Tin.
    7. Can free more precious land for west kowloon area.

    Hope the government not that stuborn to adapt new mind at this stage.
    Thanks

發表迴響

在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入:

WordPress.com Logo

您的留言將使用 WordPress.com 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Twitter picture

您的留言將使用 Twitter 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Facebook照片

您的留言將使用 Facebook 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Google+ photo

您的留言將使用 Google+ 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

連結到 %s

%d 位部落客按了讚: