Skip to content
















去信你的立法會議員和運輸及房屋局 停止政府撥款興建天價高鐵 要求立法會獨立評估專家方案

9 則迴響 leave one →
  1. 十月 19, 2009 4:27 上午


    • kts_hk permalink
      十一月 5, 2009 7:44 上午

      Project 細左. cap 水自然小.

      應該將總站建於南呀島. 造價2000億. 利益輸送就更容易,.

  2. Chan Kwong Fat permalink
    十月 20, 2009 2:41 上午

    Concerning conflict between government and the Choi Yuen villagers and the extremely high construction cost, I urge our government to consider alternative plans, and the proposition raised here is one of the good examples.

  3. Tsim Siu San permalink
    十月 20, 2009 4:32 上午

    I strongly oppose our government’s original proposal to build the termination station of the new high speed cross border rail in West Kowloon and that I support the proposition to build it in Kam Tin, to save cost as well as to bring about more convenience to most people other than those who live in or close to west Kowloon.

    No doubt the government funding comes from the people in Hong Kong, not the Chief Excutive Officer nor various government oficials. I urge them to take good care of our views and to make a good decision in spending our money, i.e. make a good choice to save cost and benefit to more citizens, relatively!

  4. Wilson permalink
    十月 20, 2009 1:42 下午

    Support your new terminal solution,west Kowloon is too crowded.

  5. Chung permalink
    十月 22, 2009 7:02 上午

    I support the revised proposal. Hope the govt. will give adequate time for public discussion.

  6. David LEUNG permalink
    十月 31, 2009 8:43 上午

    I am in support of constructing the Express Rail Link (ERL) but the Government Option is certainly NOT the best option for the continued development of Hong Kong as a whole. The Government should examine the mertis of Alternative Intergrated Option by ending the ERL ending at Kam Tin.

  7. kts_hk permalink
    十一月 5, 2009 7:39 上午

    I know why government perfer higher cost on the new railway project. It is because the bigger of the project could let the government transfer more of the benefit to the noble.

    HK Government good job!!! Please ask the taxpayer pay more for establish the superior relationship between you and big corp.

  8. Eric Yuen permalink
    十一月 28, 2009 2:58 上午

    This proposal seems more fair and cost-effective as
    1. Better utilize the “Under-Used” airport railway
    2. Enable more resident, especially new territory to take a ride on it.
    3. With a quick lane (Airport Railway) from existing Kowloon Station and Hong Kong Station, the people live there actually won’t spend more time for this new proposal.
    4. Less under-ground construction work that may affects people, less money waste
    5. More direct connection from Airport and the Express Railway station in Kam Tin
    6. Can enable more development chance for area near Kam Tin.
    7. Can free more precious land for west kowloon area.

    Hope the government not that stuborn to adapt new mind at this stage.


在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入: Logo

您的留言將使用 帳號。 登出 /  變更 )

Google+ photo

您的留言將使用 Google+ 帳號。 登出 /  變更 )

Twitter picture

您的留言將使用 Twitter 帳號。 登出 /  變更 )


您的留言將使用 Facebook 帳號。 登出 /  變更 )


連結到 %s

%d 位部落客按了讚: